Confidential AI for Legal Document Analysis
Ertas gives law firms and legal departments secure, on-premise data preparation and custom model fine-tuning for contract analysis, legal research, and document review — without exposing privileged information to external services.
The Challenges You Face
Attorney-Client Privilege Cannot Be Compromised
Uploading client documents to cloud AI services risks waiving privilege and violating ethical obligations. Most AI tools require sending data to external servers, making them incompatible with the confidentiality requirements that govern legal practice.
Legal Documents Require Domain-Specific Understanding
Generic LLMs misinterpret legal terminology, miss jurisdictional nuances, and produce unreliable contract analysis. Legal language has precise meanings that differ from common usage, and a model trained on general text cannot reliably distinguish between them.
Document Review Is the Largest Cost Center
Large-scale document review for litigation, due diligence, and regulatory compliance consumes thousands of attorney hours. AI-assisted review could dramatically reduce costs, but only if the AI understands the specific legal context well enough to be trustworthy.
Regulatory Requirements Demand Traceability
When AI assists in legal decision-making, firms need to demonstrate that the underlying data was handled properly, the model was trained on appropriate examples, and every step is documented. Ad-hoc ML workflows provide no such traceability.
How Ertas Solves This
Ertas Data Suite processes legal documents entirely on-premise, ensuring that privileged and confidential materials never leave your firm's network. The Ingest module handles PDFs, Word documents, and email archives. The Clean module normalizes formatting and extracts relevant sections. The Label module lets attorneys and paralegals annotate documents with custom taxonomies — clause types, risk levels, obligation categories — using an interface designed for legal professionals, not engineers.
Once your training dataset is prepared, Ertas Studio fine-tunes a model that understands your firm's specific practice areas, document types, and analytical frameworks. The exported GGUF model runs on your firm's servers, keeping client data within your infrastructure during both training data preparation and inference.
This combination means you can deploy AI-assisted document review, contract analysis, and legal research tools that are genuinely tailored to your practice — while maintaining the confidentiality and traceability standards your clients and regulators demand.
Key Features for Law Firms & Legal Departments
Privilege-Safe Data Processing
Data Suite runs as a native desktop application with no network requirements. Process client documents on secure workstations within your firm's network. No data is transmitted externally at any point in the pipeline.
Legal Document Ingestion
The Ingest module handles the document formats common in legal work — PDFs (including scanned), DOCX, MSG, EML, and structured data exports from eDiscovery platforms — normalizing them into a consistent format for downstream processing.
Attorney-Driven Labeling
The Label module presents documents in a review-style interface where attorneys can tag clause types, flag risks, classify relevance, and build training datasets using the same analytical judgment they apply in manual review.
Practice-Specific Model Training
Fine-tune models on your firm's own work product — contract analysis patterns, memo structures, research methodologies — so the AI reflects your firm's standards rather than generic legal knowledge.
Why It Works
- On-premise Data Suite processing satisfies the ethical obligations under ABA Model Rule 1.6 regarding confidentiality of client information in the context of AI tool usage.
- Law firms have used custom fine-tuned models to reduce first-pass document review time by 40-60% while maintaining attorney-validated accuracy levels.
- The audit trail provides the documentation required for Rule 26(g) certifications regarding the reasonableness of eDiscovery processes.
- GGUF deployment on firm-owned servers ensures that AI-assisted analysis runs within the same security perimeter as all other client work product.
- Legal teams have fine-tuned models for contract clause extraction that outperform generic LLMs by 30% or more on jurisdiction-specific provisions.
Example Workflow
A corporate law firm needs to review 50,000 contracts as part of a due diligence engagement. A paralegal team opens Ertas Data Suite on the firm's secure network, ingests the contract PDFs through the Ingest module, and runs the Clean module to extract text and normalize formatting.
Senior associates use the Label module to annotate 2,000 representative contracts, tagging change-of-control clauses, indemnification provisions, and non-compete restrictions. The Augment module generates additional training examples for under-represented clause types. A versioned dataset is exported with full audit metadata.
The litigation support team uploads the training set to Ertas Studio, fine-tunes a 13B model, and deploys the exported GGUF on the firm's GPU server. The model assists junior associates in reviewing the remaining 48,000 contracts, flagging relevant provisions for human verification — reducing review time from weeks to days while maintaining the traceability required for the engagement.
Ship AI that runs on your users' devices.
Early bird pricing starts at $14.50/mo — locked in for life. Plans for builders and agencies.