Technical reportPublished 12 October 2026Page reviewed 12 October 2026

    Where AI model spend goes for structured business tasks

    Edward Xi Yang (Ertas AI)

    TL;DR

    In OpenRouter's 30-day classified task data, classification, extraction and transformation accounted for 20.8% of model spend. Their combined spend floor was US$12.1 million, and their per-token price indices ranged from 1.50x to 1.84x the marketplace average. These patterns identify candidate workflows for customer-specific specialists, not guaranteed savings.

    Key findings

    20.8%

    of classified model spend

    Classification contributed 10.9%, extraction 7.0% and transformation 2.9% in the 30-day snapshot fetched 12 October 2026.

    US$12.1M

    combined 30-day spend floor

    This is a lower-bound estimate for the three categories, scaled from the top 20 models' weekly spend. It excludes spend outside that top-20 baseline.

    1.50x to 1.84x

    per-token price index

    The index is each task's share of spend divided by its share of tokens, relative to the marketplace average. The exact values are 1.65x for classification, 1.50x for extraction and 1.84x for transformation.

    75% to 87%

    closed frontier share of top-10 spend

    Closed frontier models accounted for 87% of the top ten models' spend in classification, 75% in extraction and 81% in transformation.

    Figures and tables

    Figure 1. Spend and token shares across three structured tasks

    Grouped horizontal bars compare each task's share of classified model spend with its share of tokens in a 30-day OpenRouter snapshot fetched 12 October 2026. Classification: 10.9% spend, 6.6% tokens, 1.65x price index. Extraction: 7.0% spend, 4.7% tokens, 1.50x. Transformation: 2.9% spend, 1.6% tokens, 1.84x. Price index is spend share divided by token share.

    OpenRouter public task-spend and token-spend rankings, snapshot fetched 12 October 2026. Bars show each task's share of classified spend and tokens. The price index is spend share divided by token share, with the marketplace average set to 1.00x. The category dollar floors and closed frontier shares are reported in the table below. Full-size image

    The three task categories in the 30-day snapshot

    TaskShare of classified spendSpend floorPer-token price indexClosed frontier share of top ten
    Classification10.9%US$6.3M1.65x87%
    Extraction7.0%US$4.1M1.50x75%
    Transformation2.9%US$1.7M1.84x81%

    OpenRouter classified task-spend and token-spend rankings, fetched 12 October 2026.

    Spend floors are lower-bound estimates. The per-token price index is spend share divided by token share, with the marketplace average set to 1.00x.

    Why it matters

    These categories are worth investigating because the work repeats and the outputs are often labels or structured records that teams can check. The market data points to a place to start, not a business case by itself. A buyer still needs to measure its own task volume, current price, output quality and operating requirements.

    Ertas is focusing its enterprise work on custom models built around repeatable, verifiable steps in a team's workflow. We establish a baseline with the team's examples, build for the task, then check each candidate version against the agreed quality bar before it takes on production work. The same process can show when a task is a poor fit for a specialist.

    Limitations

    OpenRouter labels a sample of requests across 29 task types. The task feed excludes requests in its unclassified bucket, so the percentages describe classified OpenRouter traffic rather than all AI use or all enterprise spend. The feed reports a rolling 30-day window and can change over time.

    The per-token price index is aggregate spend share divided by aggregate token share. It is not a quoted provider price, a comparison against a particular buyer's contract or a measured saving from a custom model. The category dollar figures are floors, estimated by applying task shares to the top 20 models' weekly spend. Spend from models outside that top 20 is not included in the baseline.

    The closed frontier share is calculated from the top ten models by spend in each task. These market-level patterns do not show that a custom model will meet a particular team's quality, security, latency or cost requirements. Those need to be assessed on the team's own data and evaluation criteria.

    Abstract

    We analyzed OpenRouter's public 30-day task-spend and token-spend rankings to identify repeatable business tasks where frontier models account for a high share of marketplace spend. Classification, extraction and transformation represented 20.8% of classified task spend in the snapshot. Their per-token price indices ranged from 1.50x to 1.84x the marketplace average. The findings describe sampled marketplace activity and help prioritize candidate workflows for customer-specific model evaluation. They do not establish savings for any individual buyer.

    Abstract, Ertas AI analysis of OpenRouter public rankings, snapshot fetched 2026-10-12

    Report, code and models

    Also on: OpenRouter public rankings

    Common questions

    What does the per-token price index measure?

    It divides a task's share of marketplace spend by its share of marketplace tokens. An index of 1.65x means that the task's average spend per token is 1.65 times the overall average in this classified sample.

    Does the index mean every enterprise pays that price premium?

    No. It is an aggregate index across OpenRouter's classified traffic. Provider choice, model mix, prompt and output lengths, negotiated pricing and caching all affect an individual team's bill.

    How was the US$12.1 million figure estimated?

    The three task shares were applied to a 30-day spend floor derived from the top 20 models' weekly spend. Because models outside the top 20 are omitted from that baseline, the result is a floor rather than a complete market total.

    Does this research prove a custom model will reduce our costs?

    No. It identifies high-spend task categories in marketplace data. A team would need to evaluate its own examples, quality bar, traffic, token use and deployment costs to establish whether a custom model is a good fit.

    About the authors

    Edward Xi Yang, Founder & CEO, Ertas AI

    Edward Xi Yang is the founder and CEO of Ertas AI, which builds custom small language models that run on-device, in customers' own cloud or on Ertas-managed infrastructure. He leads the company's research into training small specialist models for long-document tasks.

    Cite this work

    @techreport{ertas2026openroutertasks,
      title       = {Where AI Model Spend Goes for Structured Business Tasks},
      author      = {Yang, Edward Xi},
      institution = {Ertas AI},
      year        = {2026},
      month       = oct,
      url         = {https://www.ertas.ai/research/openrouter-structured-task-spend}
    }

    References

    Ertas AI builds custom small models trained on your data, deployed on-device, in your own cloud or on Ertas-managed infrastructure. See how Ertas AI works.